The Mc Laughlin Group Now

OK for the third week in a row the Mc Laughlin Group was minus Eleanor Clift.  One of the three topics gone into seemed to be "dead in the water' at its inception.  This is the one that says the elite outfit that has set the guidelines for the Internet as we know it since 1998 is about to be replaced by an organization run by the UN where they plan to tax the citizens of the world for their use of the Internet.  By the way there is absolutely no truth to the roomer that the British version of this blog posting is called "Mc Laughlin 2.0" and has only seven twelfths of the content in common with the American version.  (Lisa Simpson is telling me to knock it off; they're never going to get the reference)  Clearly the Internet is a good thing and we all have a good thing going with a free Internet.  And the thing is the right wing groups I don't like would most likely suffer from such overt UN control- as our side would.  But on principle it's a really awful idea.  And yet the idea is being seriously considered because of the doctrine that internet activity "ought to reflect the interests of the controling government" or whatever.

Then there is the whole global warming thing and mass hysteria on the Mc Laughlin front, with Pat Buchannon about to have a cow at the idea that scientists would ever have any say in environmental laws that business has to abide by.  I've been hearing this "1998" red hearing we've been hearing lately. I will vouch for the fact that the summer of 1998 was one of the hottest in memory.  I'll go further and say that each successive year- - 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002 each of these successive summers was cooler than the previous one, as least as I experianced it.  But clearly even Mort Zuckerman states that C02 does impact the climate of the earth and impacts, indeed the productivity of things like agriculture and tourism themselves.  So that businesses have it in their Own Interest to be aware of Global Warming.  And the very idea that Several Hundred Scientists from all over the World would conspire to form some leftist "socialist government" no doubt all disciples of Bill Ayres and Sol Allinsky - - the very idea of that is so completely absurd I'm surprised Pat and that brunette lady weren't laughed off the state.  This British guy is a smart cookie, and he's more of a cool cucumber head than is Eleanor Clift, and should be on the program more often.  Cap and Trade is basically a sound idea as I see it.  Since the economy is in recovery now, I see no reason for not implementing it immediately.

We then come to Julio Castro, the Mayor of San Antonio and has a twin brother in congress.  To be honest I didn't know Which party convention had featured these Castro Twins.  Now we know it was the democrats.  People listening to him may get a preminition of "Obama II".  And frankly I fear that the same end may befall this promising young politician if he follows in the footsteps of his "handlers" or whoever was 'handling" Barock Obama's campaign as far back as 2004.  In this day and age- - just putting just "anybody" like a throw away "B Side' of an old '45 ("What a Shame") is something we don't want to befall this guy.  I too agree with the entire panel that his magnitude of "gravitas' or whatever will be insufficient to "turn Texas blue" by the year 2016.  But Cosmically it's even more alarming.  San Antonio as a city- - is heavily influenced by the "Del Rio Group" as you may have read from our writings.  I'm not feeling the "Del Rio" vibe from this guy at all.  I don't know what kind of a guy he will "mature into".  Sometimes people grow "into" bad behavior rather than "out" of it.   (Selah)  Of course I get these mailing links from Judy saying that the Democrats are pretty fed up with President Obama now, and the expression of the day is that he's "Out of Touch".  I honestly sat and wondered about that today.  I'm thinking "Was President Bush that much worse- - when he was President?"

Electric Circuits and Computer Program flow charts have certain essential things in common.  Both have a source and an end or termanus.  With both it is important never to cross your lines- - nor to attempt to run in self perpetuating Circles.  With programming- it's a very theocentric thing.  The Programmer is as - - an all Wise and Knowing God- - at least as far as the computer is concerned.  And the end result is hopefully "Where you want to go, the realization of all your dreams".

I don't think I said this but as you know Shawn Hannity has this call screener named Linda.  And she came out and admitted that her motto is "I believe that people are basically No Good - - until they Prove to me otherwise".  But this invites the logical question that "If you believe they are no good to begin with, how inclined are you to even give them a Chance to "Prove to you that they are something Other than No Good?"  This is of course complicated by the fact that- - few liberals get on Hannity's show.  I dare say that more liberals are let through on the Rush Limbaugh show than on Hannity's.

The Rev Chuck Smith was fond of saying that if you are "unsaved" meaning not a Calvary Christian, that you were basically as an Animal in that you had neither consciouness or awareness, or any contience, or moral values.  Even apes will however work together to accomplish a common goal, and even apes will be kind and thoughtful to each other given the right circumstances.  If there is ANYONE who lacks either AWARENESS or MORAL VALUES, it is the Calvary Christian.  And Neil Savedra can quote me on that.  I would like to talk about the "Dianna Troy" phenominon.   That is - - can people in truth "Know' but don't know that they know, or to use the progressive "Know that they are knowing"?  Do prove this we would have to strip away all linkage between Cause and Effect.  If for instance one is deprived of the use of his fleshly body, which happens at Death- - what consciousness remains?  Is his perception of the passage of Time any different?  Some may argue that "It violates physics to maintain that there is ("as you put it") something entity on one side of the teter totter and one entity on the other to balance it out, because they argue that negatives of anything- - exposed to positives of anything- - will nulify each other and you end up with Nothing, almost as if Neither Existed.  Clearly that doesn't happen because we're here and breathing.  That's why we said in the last posting there is such a thing as "Aether Zero".   People say it's zero outside, knowing it really isn't "Zero" that is, in absolute terms.  But it's a functional Zero in terms of the implementation of all the laws of Einstein in special and general relativity.  So indeed there is a "function" of negativity even with positive matter- - which - - happens to be lighter than Aether.  We have likened it to something like - - - I was going to liken it to havving sex when you've had too much marijuana, but nobody would know what I was talking about.  Let's call it an "inability to Arrive".  It's not exactly a walk to the next block to traverse the Aether Wall.  As we said a year and a half ago (in that posting of early October) one can argue that it's virtually Impossible.  Or put another say "However it's done, it isn't done in a manner that man is or will be able to discover or duplicate "How it's done".   People who are no longer AWARE - - like our tea party brain dead companions- - seem, though, to live in an Effect Only world.  It's like the time when Dianna Troy lost her psychic powers, and it drove her nuts.  But what would drive a normal person nuts is the world the Tea Party people and Calvary Christians live in all the time.  (Selah)

HILLARY MAKES HER STAND

According to Politico, Clinton uses the 34-page chapter on Benghazi to rebut criticisms and rebuke critics.   "Those who exploit this tragedy over and over as a political tool minimize the sacrifice of those who served our country," Clinton reportedly wrote.   She also seemed to make reference to the election-year select committee being led by congressional Republicans, saying: "I will not be a part of a political slugfest on the backs of dead Americans. It's just plain wrong, and it's unworthy of our great country. Those who insist on politicizing the tragedy will have to do so without me."   In the chapter, the former secretary decried the "speculation and flat-out deceit" surrounding the attack, while apparently taking responsibility and describing her grief over the four deaths as a "punch in the gut."   Despite her claims, Republicans say it was the White House and others in the administration who were deceiving lawmakers and the public about the nature of the attack. New concerns about the administration's public narrative in the days immediately following Sept. 11, 2012, are what led the House to form a select committee to investigate. The controversy resurfaced following the release of emails in which a White House adviser discussed a "prep call" for then-U.N. ambassador Susan Rice, stressing the role of an anti-Islam video. Rice came under fire for repeatedly saying the Sunday after the attack, incorrectly, that protests over an anti-Islam film were to blame.   Clinton, in her book, reportedly defended Rice, saying she got her talking points from existing intelligence. Further, Clinton argued it is still "inaccurate" to say none of the attackers were influenced by the video.   Clinton insisted as well that she never saw cables requesting more security at the Benghazi compound.  Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., who has clashed with Clinton over Benghazi in the past, told Fox News in response to the book excerpts: "Sounds like a carefully crafted framework for a defense that answers nothing."   Politico also reported Friday that former National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor was being brought on by Clinton's team to help with the response to the book. Vietor stirred controversy earlier this month after he brushed off a question about talking points editing during an interview on Fox News. "Dude, this was like two years ago," Vietor said.   At the meeting of Clinton aides in Washington on Friday, at the headquarters of the centrist think tank "Third Way," one Democratic operative who attended told Fox News that it was called "to discuss the Democratic message on national security." Despite reports that the meeting was called in part to hammer out a clear response to Republicans on Benghazi, the operative said the select committee on Benghazi "did not come up."   Another Democratic source said: "It was just a bunch of us nerds. We have these meeting all the time."


Fox News' Jake Gibson and James Rosen contributed to this report.

It's the Forensics, Stupid!

But before we get to that I'd like to touch on a couple of pressing news items.  On the Chris Matthews show today there was pointed out that the FACT of mismanagement in the Vetterans Administration has NOT been addressed, this as of Thursday night's episode, by either President Obama or Eric Gensecki.  Matthews points out that the President is making a major error in seeing this whole thing as "just political" and somehow there must be a "political solution" as opposed to an ACTUAL solution, that is digging down and addressing the root of the scandal to begin with.  Perhaps the Administration may have even fallen into this trap on the Bengazi issue.  Let's hope not.  Matthews wants to know why Hillary Clinton herself wasn't sent out on the Sunday morning TV talk circuit to address the issuee herself rather than put someone out there who ended up losing her job anyhow.  There is a Real Problem about vetterans not even being able to see a doctor for an Initial Visit, for four months.  Because the disease or malody they are suffering from isn't "going to put itself on hold" for four months but will most likely get worse.  I have gleaned - just my own impression that neither General Gensecki nor President Obama wanted to get to the root systemic Causes of the problem, but somehow felt as though "If only they could do something to shut the critics up" then all would be well and (at least as far as Obama is concerned) the problem would be Solved.

Now we move on to forensics.  Indeed with the George Zimmerman case it was forensics.  We know that blood does not travel up hill.  We know that voice patterns on a tape, only point to one speaker, and any technician could end all speculation as to just who was screaming- - if a technician was only allowed to testify.  We have that Dateline show last night, where the jurors in this murder case about a man killing his wife- - it would seem to be a case of "believing insane story A - - or insane story B".  So either a woman swan dived on to a granite rock, and did not break a single bone or have any other visable injuries from the fall- - or else this man, Fred- - suddenly snapped and decided to kill his wife with no reason.  So which do we believe.  As a juror to me this wouldn't be terribly difficult.  We know that for example the husband is "Has a natural tallent for selling or convincing you of anything".  And we know he was looking for a "newer model" as far as women are concerned.  We know that witness after witness testified "his emotions on learning of his wife's death - - seemed a little off".   We move on to other forensics such as the "magic bullet theory" as to whether Oswald acted alone in killing Jack Kennedy.  It's a logical possability that Oswald may indeed be guilty of shooting the president from the school book depository- - but that shots from Another Source, with a whole other motive- - that's the bullet that Killed the President.  We could talk about Christianity and the shroud of Turin.  We are told that Carbon 14 tests invalidate the shroud as being around at the time of Christ.  We further learn from bloodstain spatter that the blood is of such a patter that it was made by a Person Still Living, and not dead.  You don't hear this.  We are told insistently that Christianity is "a historic fact".  So there ought to be witnesses.  How many "witnesses" did Justin the theologian call upon to bolster his belief in Christianity?  Like maybe the guy who actually wrapped Jesus in those burial clothes and annointed him with spices and laid him in his own family tomb.  And why is it that Irenius, who wrote after Justin - it is he, for the first time, who cites this "apostolic chain back to Christ" - - and this guy Polycarp, who was burned at the stake at age 86 apparently.   Did the earlier Justin mention him?  We are regailed with other "historic facts" that the apostle John was first boiled in oil, except "He wouldn't boil' and they took him out and banished him to the Isle of Patnos where he wrote Revelation.  Then he went to Empisus- - where he sat around saying "children, love one another".   We are also informed that ALL of the epistles of St Paul were "found in a group" in Ephesus.  Yet Justin never cites Paul by name so far as I know.  We could ask ourselves other questions like- - did the owner of the tomb who wrapped Jesus' body in spices- - - what was HIS reaction to the news that Jesus was still alive?  Did he go down to the grave site himself and see if the body was still in the tomb and maybe whoever the women saw- - was some Impostor?  No.  We never hear from Joseph of Arethmea again after the final Gospel.  It would seem that the man who physically burried Jesus- - had no concern at all about- - whether the man he laid in the grave Stayed Burried or not.  We are told further by Theologians that "knowledge" is bad.  That is "experiential knowledge" or "investigative knowledge' or "an acquaintance with" - is bad.  We are informed that real Truth is 'revealed" not gone after and hunted down and scientifically investigated.

I was thinking of including an excerpt from the chapter on Hillary Clinton's upcoming book on all of the Bengazi issues.  I urge readers to secure a copy of this text and read it through, as soon as you can.  Hillary announced a principle here we need to think about.  She said "Is this a case of Unanswered Questions - - or rather is it a case of "Un listened to Answers?"  You can apply it to the previous paragraph, or the previous posting if you want to.  Where are all of the "Answers" that we have supposedly been given on all of these issues that somehow I have not "been listening to"?  I would honestly like to be informed if you can tell me.  I'm glad to see that Hillary is willing to come out fighting.  I regard the desire to Justify one's own actions as not a "carnal" attribute, but rather as inherent and good and proper as part of ones innate nature.  Interestingly "the survival instinct" is what Ron Hubbard and his cohorts - call the greatest Virtue of all.  (Selah)  As I said one of the things that prompted me to vote for George Bush over John Kerry in 2004 was that after the Swift Boat campaign attacks, John Kerry had little if any response to it.  It would seem to me he was content to let the many charges levied go unresponded to.  Hillary Clinton is not making the same mistake, but instead wisely has decided to come out swinging.

I would now like to address that long and arguably confusing paragraph at the end of the March 4th blog posting.  One might say "He's rambling and doesn't know what the hell he's talking about".  Let me go to give this example though.  Just like with that first jury last night in the Colorado murder case- - it doesn't matter whether jury members are- - half convinced the guy is guilty or even three fourths convinced the guy is guilty.  Because under the rules you have to be one hundred percent convinced the guy is guilty.  It's like champansees in a room with a big bunch of bananas on a high platform or ledge.  They are unable to leap high enough to reach the bananas.  But if there are blocks in the room they can construct steps or a stool or something to climb up in increments to get those bananas.  So it is with you people's understanding of that long paragraph.  So let me explain things again in a different manner you haven't heard before.  Rather than think of the hour glass- - or terms like UP or DOWN perhaps it's wiser to speak in terms of "close to the wall" or "farther away from the wall".  Now "The wall"  it could be an engram wall or a bozon wall - - but the WALL represents Death.  But it also represents Certainty.  It also represents Time (almost as a thing) and it represents Gravity.  Yes, there is a positive coralation between the presence of Gravity and Time.  And we spoke of "Gravitas" in that paragraph.  So what is "Gravitas".  It's basically what you might call throw weight.  Under Newtonian physics- - Throw Weight or Impact Weight- - is influenced by both Mass and Speed.  If you increase either the Speed or Mass you increase the weight impact.  The other variable can also influence Impact weight.  This would be- - the measuring unit you use to measure the plane - - two dimensional plane- where the impact is to take place.  If you shrink the measuring unit- - you increase the weight or if you will - gravitas.  And perhaps the Bowling example will fit better here.  Because as I learned in a computer Bowling game- - accurecy isn't everything.  Speed counts.  If you don't have the speed of the throw of the ball, your "gravitas" goes down.  So now we speak of "karmic speed".   We said that Death was Predictability - - and so Life is unpredictability - or if you will "Free Will".  The farther you are away from "The Wall" the more free will you have.  Also in the Bible there is spoken of that "Life is in an eternal opposition to Death".   At this time we remind you when we speak in terms of 'zero mass" as physicists measure it - - is "aether zero".   (A minor but inportant distinction)  We also spoke of the "Low Pressure area" as if it were "rising air" or the "upward drive" of the human spirit.  But there is also this "movement tword the Wall", which might be called the "force of certainty" or some might call "Sin".  I'd remind you we said "sin is the price we pay for existance"  So some might (reasonably) infer that I am elevated the state of Sin Itself to a status it has never enjoyed before.  (Selah)  Let's look at this further.  Let me ask you - is there "error" in pure Fact, as in "Factual occurance"?  Some would say that "sin is a flaw in God-planned perfection".  Really?  You may cry "oh but for Sin, the world would be so wonderful!" But let me ask you "If you are God and you express your Will for the Future- - and the Future diverts from your goal for it- - who is the one who Sinned?  Did "The World' Sin because it deviated from your Divine Plans- - or is it in fact that your Divine Plans "Sinned" because they missed "The Mark" which when you come to it is "Whatever actually ends up happening".   So there is this pull of "The Wall" that seems to pull and drive people.  We then spoke of the "upper world' of Cause and the "lower world' of Effect.  Could it be that in an ironic way we are protected from the worst machinations of Evil people because of their own Sin, which prevents them from carrying out their very worse desires?  (Selah)  Here's another paradox.  For the psyche to exist in the world, it can only do this if to some extent it conforms to the "conventions" of the World.  The more something in fact "exists" as a physicist would measure it- -the more it has to (as St Paul dreads saying) conform to the elemental laws of the Universe.  There is your dreaded "downward pull" or "being pulled tword the Wall.  But I told you that you needn't think of UP or DOWN because it's all relative anyhow.  In order to be a THING that EXISTS it's more "material" to exist - - - IN as much TIME as you can.  Consider what I have said about the certainty of The Wall and the Uncertainty away from it- -as my own version of "The Heizenberg Uncertainty Principle".   The more Time you have the more Certainty there is in the world.  The more positive you can be about one event Following another or say "This event' came Before "That".  And it's pretty much "easier to play the game" the more certainty you have about the Rules, then you aren't at all of what the rules are or what will happen when you take this or that action.   Just remember that- - these all run in bunches.  You have Existance, and Order, sequence- - Time - - Gravity - - all on one side of the ledger, and their opposites on the other side.  Now having absorbed the knowledge of this paragraph, so tack now and try to tackle the other paragraph from three months ago.

The Dog That Didn't Bark

Most of this posting is about 9 -11.  It seems if a crime is horrific and blatant enough, those who plerpetrated it seem to be immune from any day of reckoning, and seem to sleep very well at night.

Gabriel Hernandez apparently finds cold blood murder therapeutic.  It’s amazing how peaceful and unruffled she’s been throughout this whole thing.  Until just now nobody ever questioned her about the murder – and she wasn’t the least bit concerned.   I find the whole thing really stretching my ability to believe.  They left out the key scene where Jennifer told Eric what she had learned from overhearing a conversation between Daniel and Nicole.  I thought she would burst in with a fury of anger.  But instead she smartly goes to where Eric is in the park or wherever, and informs him of Nicole’s treachery.   Now the jig is up.  Nocole is officially “done”.  Stick a fork in her.  It is my abiding Prayer that the Christian Church would meet a similar ignominius fate.

Thom Hartman claims that George Bush never even went back to Washington DC after his “longest presidential vacation since George Washington” in August and September of 2001.  Then he sequestered himself with brother Jeb Bush in Florida.  I’d like to know what timetable Hartman is working off of.  Sometimes though it just seems that if your crime is bad and blatant enough- - the Day of Reckoning never arrives.  It seemed to not bother Hartman that it could be multiple decades before we ever learn the real truth about what happened in and around 9 – 11 – 2001.  I was looking up President Bush’s movements at the time of 9 – 11.  Since he was in the limozine when he got the news of the first Twin Tower attack, he could have been watching it on sattalite TV hook-up or something that nobody else sees.  It’s a case of “The dog that didn’t bark” because the secret service agents were not concerned at all about the President’s safety in terms of going to the elementary school, or whether he himself was in personal danger.  And the interruption from Andrew Card while reading to the school children “had the nature more of a progress report rather than anything new and alarming”.   They say the President read to the children for another fifteen minutes.  And then they took off to Shriveport, and he didn’t make it back to the Capital till just before seven that evening.  The whole thing smells.  Laura of course remained in Washington D. C. 

The ammount of evidence indicating funny business surrounding the events of 9 - 11 is overwhelming.  Here's one you may have forgotten about.  ABC news actually once upon a time used to do investigative stories like you'd never see today.  There was a raft of "put" stock options against certain key Airlines the Thursday before the 9 - 11 attacks.  The other heavy "put" action involved companies that were headquartered in the World Trade Center buildings.  I "put" is basically a "short" for cowards, where you make a lot of money is the price of a stock collapses suddenly.  I think they were saying that certain "put" options were made ninety TIMES the rate that ONE DAY that they would be made in a normal three week period.  The ammount of profit to be made and presumably WAS made was ginormous!   Profit from massive tragedy!

There were so many witness speaking of and reporting explosions in the Twin Towers, it isn't funny, and apparently this even includes George Stephanopolus.  Strangely, a lot of these witnesses ended up dead.  We went into detail a week or so back about explosive devices being strapped on the bottom of at least one plane and how BOTH planes have visual proof- - of a flash- - just an instant prior to impact.  They've gone over the photos with high tech analysis.

Dick Chaney demanded to take over NORAD in June of 2001.  Prior to then the generals had always called the shot but Dick Chaney insisted on personal control.  He issued a "stand down" order on 9 - 11.  Secretary Rice for one flat out lied when she said "There was absolutely expectation of any plains hitting buildings.  Not only had she been warned expressly about this several weeks prior, but also there were in fact Drills involving planes crashing into buildings carried out by the CIA,

Clearly the plot to the "Flight 93" thing was pure fiction.  For one thing cell phones aren't allowed on flights.  But further- - they say a cell phone wouldn't work at the altitude and speed this craft was flying.  Also there is a man eye witness who talked about "The lights dimming' just before the ariel explosion.  He was later told this is what a fighter craft does.  It emits a signal to jam the radar of the object plane- - just before taking it out.  There was also that woman who was told in essence by FBI agents "what she saw" when it WASN'T what she saw.  She swears the plane she saw was too small to be a 757 and also people report seeing a second plane matching speed to the first.  There are reports of witnesses of the second plane "flying off into the sun" so it could not be identified.  Also on the supposed "tape" - - cockpit tapes don't cover conversation in the rest of the plane, yet this recording picked up passenger chatter.  Also the final words spoken by the hijackers was not that of the standard Islamic prayer, which is 'There is only one God, and Mohamed is his prophet".  This is the prayer ever devout Muslem is supposed to recite when he is facing imminent death.

There is finally the fact that these hijackers couldn't possibly fly these big complex planes with the paultry ammount of flying training they had, where they weren't very good.  There is also this one guy who repeated to the FBI in advance that "They were being taught to crash into buildings" and was ignored every time.  Of course the FBI produced this list of nineteen hijackers with extrordenary speed.  But guess what?  Several of the hijackers turned up later very much Alive.  AND the FBI did NOT modify their list after they found this out.  Also there were no autopseys done on ANY of the dead hijackers.  Why?  Also none of these nineteen names showed up on the passenger list.  This is a pretty tough trick to pull off.  Also there are alligations one of the Bin Laden videos was faked because the man was right handed and Bin Laden is left handed, or visa versa.  Other than hearing the voice of God booming down from Mt Sinai itself- - I hardly see how you could have any more convincing proof.

Unfortunately the whole presentation ends on a bit of an off note, because they resurrect the plot line from the book "The Fourth Turning' with its eight year cycles.  They take to attacking the Federal Reserve and speak of replacing the dollar with an international currency.  They then go out on a limb and say there will be some Naval incident or something in the straits of Hormuz in the Pursian Gulf where the US conducts a "false flag" opperation in order to start a war with Iran and China, because it would seem "The non white nations are taking over and we are very much afraid of that".  My cosmic sources tell me that the odds of any war with Iran at this point is infinitessably low.  But all the same I think there is going to be some "faked up crisis' in a few months- - just not this.  It still pays for all of us to have our psychic antenna up for anything and keep our eyes pealed for trouble.

Government Manipulation of Our Discorse of Crucial Issues

I was going to write on a somewhat different topic than this which I may get to later in this posting if I remember, but clearly we have a major problem here, that's a lot worse than I ever dreamed.  The government not only listens in but plants stories and sabotages credibility of good reporters reporting relivent news- - and spreads lies and plants "false victim" stories about people they don't like.  Below is just a sampling of the stuff anybody can look up in George Washington's blog.  Clearly there are enough links right here to keep you busy for a long time. But I just want to say this.  Who is the person who is MOST responsible for the existance of the Tea Party we've suffered with these past five years.  President Obama.  Second place isn't even close.  Without President Obama this "peculiarly qualified man" the Tea Party would not have had nearly the Drive and Energy it's had these past five years.  If we turn the proposition around - - what is by far the BIGGEST accomplishment or Deed of the Obama Administration- - - it's bringing into existance, NOT Obama Care, but bringing into existance the Tea Party.  For me the trade off is a no brainer.  I would gladly get rid of President Obama if we also could get rid of the Tea Party.  It's kind of the same effect we see with our presence in Iraq for eight years and the rise of Al Qaeda.  Al Qaeda was far less a Cause than an Effect, a Reaction to 120,000 dead Iraquis killed by US Armed Forces.  The thing that President Obama has MOST working against him is that Powers - - are attributed to him that he doesn't have.  I heard today on the Rush Limbaugh show that "President Obama's long term goal is to drive the Health Insurance companies out of business".  Giving them scads of Free additional business- - mandated by law, in fact, is a strange way to drive them out of Business.  But people on the right don't take the least thought of things they are told.  Remember the right goes on Feelings.  We claim that women are illogical and "go too much on feelings" (a proposition I don't agree with) but the minions of the tea party right - - the fodder on the front lines and the first to be mowed down- - THESE are the people given to hopeless "fits of Illogical thinking".

One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction. It’s time to tell a chunk of that story, complete with the relevant documents.  Over the last several weeks, I worked with NBC News to publish a series of articles about “dirty trick” tactics used by GCHQ’s previously secret unit, JTRIG (Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group). These were based on four classified GCHQ documents presented to the NSA and the other three partners in the English-speaking “Five Eyes” alliance. Today, we at the Intercept are publishing another new JTRIG document, in full, entitled “The Art of Deception: Training for Online Covert Operations.”
By publishing these stories one by one, our NBC reporting highlighted some of the key, discrete revelations: the monitoring of YouTube and Blogger, the targeting of Anonymous with the very same DDoS attacks they accuse “hacktivists” of using, the use of “honey traps” (luring people into compromising situations using sex) and destructive viruses. But, here, I want to focus and elaborate on the overarching point revealed by all of these documents: namely, that these agencies are attempting to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse, and in doing so, are compromising the integrity of the internet itself.  Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums. Here is one illustrative list of tactics from the latest GCHQ document we’re publishing today:


You know that the NSA and other government agencies are spying on all Americans.
But is the government just passively spying on us like some giant peeping Tom? Or doing something with that information?

Favoring “Friends”

U.S. intelligence agencies have given information gained through spying to a handful of giant corporations for many years. This trend is accelerating.

Harassing “Enemies”

While the NSA is the best-known spy agency at the moment, the IRS, FBI, and many other agencies also conduct their own mass spying on Americans.  Reuters recently broke the story that information gained through spying on Americans is funneled through a special unit within the Drug Enforcement Agency, and then distributed to federal, state and local agencies nationwide.  The agencies are instructed to “launder” the information by pretending that they got it from normal gumshoe investigations, and not spying.
Reuters notes that laundered information gained through spying is being used to prosecute petty crimes, including taxes and drugs … and neither the defense attorneys or even the judges are being told the real source of the information   Top NSA whistleblower William Binney – the former head of the National Security Agency’s global digital data gathering program, and a 32-year veteran of that agency who was a “legend” among NSA workers – says that the NSA database is used to harass and even frame anyone the government doesn’t like.  Another high-level NSA whistleblower (Russell Tice, who worked on satellite spying for the agency for two decades) says that the NSA is spying on – and blackmailing – top government officials and military officers (and see this; and this PBS interview).  Indeed, because government spying has always focused on crushing dissent, it is safe to assume that the government will use the information it gathers.

I wanted to talk just a little here with my own thoughts about some of the other Eleven Dimensions - or Twelve if you can't one I don't think it's possible "to get to from here".   Just to insert in a remark right here one could say that certain aspects of Karma are "A-Moral".  It's not always that "goodness" is karmic strength and "evil" is karmic weakness.  We call these evil but strong entities "Demonic" because often they come out of nowhere and strike.  Our prayer is that we retreat from wherever they came - - just to get them off our backs.  By the way- - the whole "talking backwards" and all that stuff- - is not wholly wrong.  What I didn't say on the first draft of this paragraph is that "technically' time runs backwards in what we'll call "the upper world" as opposed to "this world".  We'll explain more in a minute.  We talked about "Karmic weight" and said that Karmic gravity was a bad thing.  What either Karmic Weight or Karmic Gravity really IS - - is (we've said this before) the karmic price we pay for our own Existance.  That is "The Flesh" or sometimes in the bible the word "Psyche" is used- - - is kind of a greedy, self demanding thing that pulls us all down from what we otherwise might be, much as I or anybody may not like that whole notion.  Actually karmic "energy" or "force" nurtured and developed by one's Own Will actually works constructively in a football or chess analogy with weight, which works for us the same way a powerful lineman with "gravitas" can get his own way.  Neither Free Will nor Desire are sins of themselves.  In fact, (and I said this way back in my book in 1980) that Free Will is actually the Enemy of Sin.  They won't tell you this in Sunday school.  Indeed the Apostle Paul said "The things I would not do - - these I do and the things I would do, I do not do".  (Selah)  This is true obviously in the "here and now" material world- - but also in the "karmic realm".   Remember we spoke of karmic space and things like psychic "reach", which are also things in the material world.  It was in a posting in this very "Soap Opera" blog early October of 2012 that we talked about this karmic vortex hour glass- (though you may prefer the more exacting image of a giant funnel) - where the top half spins around one way - - probably counter clockwise (viewed from the top of the hour glass) and in the lower portion spins around clockwise (when viewed from the top)  Viewed from the bottom this would be reversed, of course. Yeah, kind of like atmospheric weather systems.  But - -  only in the top of "Cause" aspect of this karmic hour glass is "lightness" or "upwardness" at a premium.  The "faster" you are (in terms of your own Free Will karmic energy) the more "Cause Gravitas" you have, ironically.  In the "lower world' of the here and now - - you see this "Karmic energy" as Material Force.  I'm sensing I'm not making myself clear and since I've already discussed it before we'll move on to one more thing I wanted to bring up.  Time.  People in a shall we say "Lower level karmic playing field" the element of Time is more apparent.  This is because "things just take longer to happen".  And as such - - things can be more easily Organized.  Things are Simpler like a level one Playing Game as opposed to Level Ten, which is much more difficult.  So just superimpose all this on top of everything else we've said about Karma.  More of immidiate short term importance is the particular Feng Chue you encounter this day.  The vibes are much more auspicious on some days than on other days.  But just as Roller Coasters use tighter turns - - as the energy winds down to achieve the same effects as earlier in the ride - - so there is a way (if you can pull it off) to "give yourself a boost in effective energy without having to "develop any more karmic muscles".   Sounds pretty neat.  Some call it "psychic down-shifting" but I'm not sure one has control over it.  Really of more importance if how much "Karmic Space" you control.  But this element of Time struck me- - - because in terms of time you exert on each individual "challenge" Time - (because their fewer of them to worry about) - as an almost (even actual) material substance - - the densness of the Gravitons- - the closer you get to the Karmic Wall or Ether Wall or whatever we're calling it these days.  (Oddly the Scientology term for it is - - Death)  People with more Time usually make better decisions.  You just seem to have less Time in a difficult Arcade Video Game than in you do in an easier one of easier difficulty.  Psychic "Reach" is also important- - pertaining to how much karmic space you control.  And also if you are in the Psychic Reach of a Demon - - particularly one who has psychically down-shifted- - you are in heap big trouble.   Well, now you know why I didn't spend the whole posting with the general topics of this paragraph.  That would make the whole posting appear unreadable.

The Great National Stupor

How do you like this as a great opening topic sentence?  In excess of thirty years our nation has been in a Great National Stupor.  I watched that “Deep State” interview on the GW blog video last night- - muting the Jeopardy sound - - and what struck me is “There is nothing new here.  We know all this stuff.  We know that our government is “broken” but constitutional government is “no longer necessary” in today’s corporaticracy.  We live by the executive order and the back door deal like that “dollars instead of voters” ad they show on the Stephanie Miller show where the dollars little by little supplant the ranks of American voters.    We are in a great national stupor because it’s like people smoking opium in days of old- - - they seem to have shall we say “lost interest” in things like justice and democracy, that used to be very important to them.  It started all the way back in 1978 with the Howard Jarvis tax payer’s revolt - - and continued with William Casey making that deal with Iran not to release the hostages till Reagan took office.  It continued through the Revolution of 1994 because whatever problems we faced before we were always protected to a degree “back-stopped” with a Democratic House.  Now this was gone and we pass things like the Communacations Act of 1996, and frankly, I’ve always had my doubts, even at the time, whether the “Defense of Marriage Act” was even constitutional.  We know the interplay between the treasury and Wall Street and the NSA and what Ike called the whole “Military Industrial Complex” that engages in war not for principle, to defend anybody or defend democracy or liberty- - but for these people it’s the bottom line.  If there is profit to be made by going to War we’ll do it- - and who cares how many brave fighting men are killed or maimed for life.  None of this is new knowledge.  We know about Iran Contra, and we know that “money was being filtered into Iraq- - right after 9 – 11 and I was one Republican who was really puzzled as to why”.  This is the guy who did the GW video.

 But now we come to Vladimir Putin- - and I think I’ve had one of those light bulb experiences.  I’m sure you’ve always wondered how or why Adolph Hitler got away with taking pieces of Europe one by one without firing a shot.  Now we know.  Nobody cared.  We were all to stupurous to even know or care what was happening before our eyes or the perils we were setting ourselves up for.  It’s funny how the media is now switching sides, just like the Trayvon Martin case.  At first they were normal people who “knew what was going on here”.  But now- - as this opium like hypnosis takes over we are increasingly hearing stuff like how Putin is fully justified in taking over Crimea and the West won’t do anything about it because Russia’s military is a lot bigger than the Ukraine, and might makes right and all.  And of course the cry goes out “Don’t fight and don’t resist because it will only make Putin mad”.   And Putin won’t guarantee that this is the final move on his part.  He wanted the whole country of Ukraine, and now he’s taking Crimea as a consolation prize.  Putin wants it known that “This is not necessarily over” and that’s the most unsetteling fact of all.  Nothing is decided.  The world is saying in essence “Whatever Putin wants, Putin gets” because nobody, even today in the 21^st Century - - has the will to stop him.  Kerry can call it a “Nineteenth Century tactic” and talk about how he has an economic price to pay.  But others say “Putin has taken all of this into consideration and decided it was worth it”.  In other words- - Putin has placed himself above NATO and the EEC and the UN and this country- - and whoever else who might at this point enter a feeble protest.  And in this year of 2014 is that all we’ll hear from the American electorate this year as a “feeble protest”?   The funny thing is - - think about this - - the Tea Party can only GAIN in congress this year if this “Outrage against Obama” or whoever EXCEEDS that of 2010.  Because think about it.  If this outrage against “The left” is equal to what it was in 2010 then- - the Same Percentage of right wingers will get elected as we got from 2010.   And yet democrats are scared spitless that now the Democrats won’t even hold the US Senate.  But as I said a minute ago- - the House is the thing that will make or break progressivism.

Can I just say this about Stephanie and the gang’s endless mocking of that one caller who kept talking about his floppy disk in the commodore 64 and dialing up Compu-Serve?  Sometimes it’s true that a caller takes too LONG to make a point.  Other people like me- - who’s brains work much more quickly- - are often too QUICK to come to the Point.  You know like High School geometry- - the idea of laying it out “how you got from here to there” struck me is kindergarten type exercises.  I’d like to harken back to this whole idea of “What is Time itself” in terms of how it came into existence and all.   You all know the “Starburst” version of the origen of all Creation - - the ENTIRE “Big Bang” so to speak.  But a couple of years ago I took the liberty to modify this Starburst theory - - all the straight lines going out like an asterisk - - and decided to introduce a 3 D element to it, which thus makes a “Tulip” formation, which has nothing to do with John Calvin.  This so called “third dimension” is what I call “Event time”.  Because - - - like the Egyptian balance scales of old- - with each side having weights of evidence place on it- - - Cause is on one side and Effect is on the other.  But the “fulcrum” of this whole thing is “The Event”.  The Event- - (s) is what according to this theory - - signals the progression of Time.  The Event- - is thus singularly IN time neither as a Cause or Effect but it’s just THERE.  Time moves neither forward nor backward with The Event.  We call Engrams “Events”.  They are “Events” in the Mind.  We also used the idea of the “Tulip” formation - - in terms of a single “petal” so to speak as a metaphor for a single life.  When you are every young you don’t “learn” from one Event to the next.  When you are older you conceptualize- - and organize your Events- - and hopefully see causes and effects for Events in your life.  We have said that - - Causes - - are what we call this “Lighter than Ether” force- - and that like the bathroom scale at fifteen pounds per square inch of PRESSURE of the atmosphere- - the thing still registers as Zero.  We thus label this reading a “false zero”.  It’s the Zero we reference in our own minds.  The “fulcrum” in nature thus is not really “Zero” but rather this “Ether Wall” as we have referred to it.  You have Cause on one side of the Ether Wall and Effect – on the other, as the other side of the equation and nature dictates both sides of the equation must balance.

The media at large, and NATO and the UN and people on conservative and liberal call in shows alike are all united against Vladimir Putin’s military invasion of the Crimea and taking over all the bases there.  However George Washington’s blog is another of those rare bird “apologists” for Putin.  He likens our meddling there as the same as “fighting the Iraq War all to keep oil supplies open”.  Like I say if that was our goal it was a major failure because oil prices tripled during this period.  First I clicked on the Bush and the “oil supply” justification for the Iraq war, and then clicked on Bush’s 2005 speech itself.  Someone said on FOX news that “Iran wants to take over Syria and Lebanon and Iraq”.   Back in those days we were really afraid of Iran, which we aren’t now, even though the danger is much more apparent now than then.  Perhaps I should post these sentaments as a counter-point to George Washington’s blog, since I know that blog is widely read.   MY POINT IS AS FOLLOWS  Maybe I'm the only one but the United States seems to have never actually gone against the nation of Iran but always seems to have handled them with kid gloves.  We didn't protest their election of 2009.  We never attempted any real invasion of Iran when they took our hostages in 1979.  We sold TOW missiles to them in the mid 1980s.  And we put in a Shiite government in the nation of Iraq more friendly to Iran, and now we "trust" Iran to get rid of their centrafuges and other uranium enrichment activities so they don't build an Atomic Bomb to drive Israel into the Sea, which is what they have been contually threatening up until VERY recently.  Think about it

DEMONS ARE CAUSES - AND THE TARGETED PEOPLE FEEL THE EFFECTS.

I read the files “nevertheless” and “Kar-mageddon” from late September of 2012 and noted a similar era in a blog I read earlier.  At late as late September of 2012 it seems as I were just trying to “fill space with a topic” with little of heartfelt passion on the subject.   There is nothing wrong with these “let’s just talk about a topic for the heck of it” blogs.  Indeed, it’s all some people ever do with Sunday sermons.  That first encounter with Jim in the halls is an event I never seem to have reported that took place late Saturday afternoon on the 29^th.   Jim had on these old jeans and a wide brimmed hat and sun glasses and long grayish white hair and kind of walked with a swagger down the hall.  And I greeted him as I approached- and then realized it wasn’t Terry.  And the look the guy gave me was something like “Don’t you dare say anything to me like that again!”   I never stopped being on the defensive about Jim from that moment on till the Monday morning he left and kind of leered at me as he left his room for the last time.  I noted though that somebody- - in audio range but out of visual range said “Here comes that nut case” as I approached three people.   That “Ron” guy hasn’t been here in a long time.  There is reference made to a “Gloria” but I thought the Gloria we know had long since left.  Then there is a reference made to a “Mark” who lends money (?).  Nora is here right now.  It’s interesting to see the changing case of characters around here.  It’s after three right now.  I just had another idea for a new posting called  

“Cause and effects are such nasty words”.  It’s along the lines that Causes have natural Effects- - as a natural course of things, and this should not be seen the least big unusual of “deviant”.  People fancy themselves as “Causes” when so much of the time they are either beneficiaries of victims of “effects” that isn’t talked about enough.

  The soap opera featured Sonny talking tough with Nick Fallon.  Yes, you can really be a thug and also a faggot.  There is such a misplaced case of moral priorities among Sonny and Will and Samantha.  They seem to think Nick is “doing something to them” when in reality- - Nick just wants to blend in and be a normal person.  But if Samantha or Sonny wants to go to the police and claim somehow they feel threatened by Nick even being in the same room, they can just explain the whole thing to Roman Brady about “what Nick has put them all through” even those months he was believed dead.  I’m sure Roman will understand.  I wonder why Samantha doesn’t do that.  (He says in jest)