Then there is the whole global warming thing and mass hysteria on the Mc Laughlin front, with Pat Buchannon about to have a cow at the idea that scientists would ever have any say in environmental laws that business has to abide by. I've been hearing this "1998" red hearing we've been hearing lately. I will vouch for the fact that the summer of 1998 was one of the hottest in memory. I'll go further and say that each successive year- - 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002 each of these successive summers was cooler than the previous one, as least as I experianced it. But clearly even Mort Zuckerman states that C02 does impact the climate of the earth and impacts, indeed the productivity of things like agriculture and tourism themselves. So that businesses have it in their Own Interest to be aware of Global Warming. And the very idea that Several Hundred Scientists from all over the World would conspire to form some leftist "socialist government" no doubt all disciples of Bill Ayres and Sol Allinsky - - the very idea of that is so completely absurd I'm surprised Pat and that brunette lady weren't laughed off the state. This British guy is a smart cookie, and he's more of a cool cucumber head than is Eleanor Clift, and should be on the program more often. Cap and Trade is basically a sound idea as I see it. Since the economy is in recovery now, I see no reason for not implementing it immediately.
We then come to Julio Castro, the Mayor of San Antonio and has a twin brother in congress. To be honest I didn't know Which party convention had featured these Castro Twins. Now we know it was the democrats. People listening to him may get a preminition of "Obama II". And frankly I fear that the same end may befall this promising young politician if he follows in the footsteps of his "handlers" or whoever was 'handling" Barock Obama's campaign as far back as 2004. In this day and age- - just putting just "anybody" like a throw away "B Side' of an old '45 ("What a Shame") is something we don't want to befall this guy. I too agree with the entire panel that his magnitude of "gravitas' or whatever will be insufficient to "turn Texas blue" by the year 2016. But Cosmically it's even more alarming. San Antonio as a city- - is heavily influenced by the "Del Rio Group" as you may have read from our writings. I'm not feeling the "Del Rio" vibe from this guy at all. I don't know what kind of a guy he will "mature into". Sometimes people grow "into" bad behavior rather than "out" of it. (Selah) Of course I get these mailing links from Judy saying that the Democrats are pretty fed up with President Obama now, and the expression of the day is that he's "Out of Touch". I honestly sat and wondered about that today. I'm thinking "Was President Bush that much worse- - when he was President?"
Electric Circuits and Computer Program flow charts have certain essential things in common. Both have a source and an end or termanus. With both it is important never to cross your lines- - nor to attempt to run in self perpetuating Circles. With programming- it's a very theocentric thing. The Programmer is as - - an all Wise and Knowing God- - at least as far as the computer is concerned. And the end result is hopefully "Where you want to go, the realization of all your dreams".
I don't think I said this but as you know Shawn Hannity has this call screener named Linda. And she came out and admitted that her motto is "I believe that people are basically No Good - - until they Prove to me otherwise". But this invites the logical question that "If you believe they are no good to begin with, how inclined are you to even give them a Chance to "Prove to you that they are something Other than No Good?" This is of course complicated by the fact that- - few liberals get on Hannity's show. I dare say that more liberals are let through on the Rush Limbaugh show than on Hannity's.
The Rev Chuck Smith was fond of saying that if you are "unsaved" meaning not a Calvary Christian, that you were basically as an Animal in that you had neither consciouness or awareness, or any contience, or moral values. Even apes will however work together to accomplish a common goal, and even apes will be kind and thoughtful to each other given the right circumstances. If there is ANYONE who lacks either AWARENESS or MORAL VALUES, it is the Calvary Christian. And Neil Savedra can quote me on that. I would like to talk about the "Dianna Troy" phenominon. That is - - can people in truth "Know' but don't know that they know, or to use the progressive "Know that they are knowing"? Do prove this we would have to strip away all linkage between Cause and Effect. If for instance one is deprived of the use of his fleshly body, which happens at Death- - what consciousness remains? Is his perception of the passage of Time any different? Some may argue that "It violates physics to maintain that there is ("as you put it") something entity on one side of the teter totter and one entity on the other to balance it out, because they argue that negatives of anything- - exposed to positives of anything- - will nulify each other and you end up with Nothing, almost as if Neither Existed. Clearly that doesn't happen because we're here and breathing. That's why we said in the last posting there is such a thing as "Aether Zero". People say it's zero outside, knowing it really isn't "Zero" that is, in absolute terms. But it's a functional Zero in terms of the implementation of all the laws of Einstein in special and general relativity. So indeed there is a "function" of negativity even with positive matter- - which - - happens to be lighter than Aether. We have likened it to something like - - - I was going to liken it to havving sex when you've had too much marijuana, but nobody would know what I was talking about. Let's call it an "inability to Arrive". It's not exactly a walk to the next block to traverse the Aether Wall. As we said a year and a half ago (in that posting of early October) one can argue that it's virtually Impossible. Or put another say "However it's done, it isn't done in a manner that man is or will be able to discover or duplicate "How it's done". People who are no longer AWARE - - like our tea party brain dead companions- - seem, though, to live in an Effect Only world. It's like the time when Dianna Troy lost her psychic powers, and it drove her nuts. But what would drive a normal person nuts is the world the Tea Party people and Calvary Christians live in all the time. (Selah)
HILLARY MAKES HER STAND
According to Politico, Clinton uses the 34-page chapter on Benghazi to rebut criticisms and rebuke critics. "Those who exploit this tragedy over and over as a political tool minimize the sacrifice of those who served our country," Clinton reportedly wrote. She also seemed to make reference to the election-year select committee being led by congressional Republicans, saying: "I will not be a part of a political slugfest on the backs of dead Americans. It's just plain wrong, and it's unworthy of our great country. Those who insist on politicizing the tragedy will have to do so without me." In the chapter, the former secretary decried the "speculation and flat-out deceit" surrounding the attack, while apparently taking responsibility and describing her grief over the four deaths as a "punch in the gut." Despite her claims, Republicans say it was the White House and others in the administration who were deceiving lawmakers and the public about the nature of the attack. New concerns about the administration's public narrative in the days immediately following Sept. 11, 2012, are what led the House to form a select committee to investigate. The controversy resurfaced following the release of emails in which a White House adviser discussed a "prep call" for then-U.N. ambassador Susan Rice, stressing the role of an anti-Islam video. Rice came under fire for repeatedly saying the Sunday after the attack, incorrectly, that protests over an anti-Islam film were to blame. Clinton, in her book, reportedly defended Rice, saying she got her talking points from existing intelligence. Further, Clinton argued it is still "inaccurate" to say none of the attackers were influenced by the video. Clinton insisted as well that she never saw cables requesting more security at the Benghazi compound. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., who has clashed with Clinton over Benghazi in the past, told Fox News in response to the book excerpts: "Sounds like a carefully crafted framework for a defense that answers nothing." Politico also reported Friday that former National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor was being brought on by Clinton's team to help with the response to the book. Vietor stirred controversy earlier this month after he brushed off a question about talking points editing during an interview on Fox News. "Dude, this was like two years ago," Vietor said. At the meeting of Clinton aides in Washington on Friday, at the headquarters of the centrist think tank "Third Way," one Democratic operative who attended told Fox News that it was called "to discuss the Democratic message on national security." Despite reports that the meeting was called in part to hammer out a clear response to Republicans on Benghazi, the operative said the select committee on Benghazi "did not come up." Another Democratic source said: "It was just a bunch of us nerds. We have these meeting all the time."
Fox News' Jake Gibson and James Rosen contributed to this report.