Saturday, May 31, 2014

The Mc Laughlin Group Now

OK for the third week in a row the Mc Laughlin Group was minus Eleanor Clift.  One of the three topics gone into seemed to be "dead in the water' at its inception.  This is the one that says the elite outfit that has set the guidelines for the Internet as we know it since 1998 is about to be replaced by an organization run by the UN where they plan to tax the citizens of the world for their use of the Internet.  By the way there is absolutely no truth to the roomer that the British version of this blog posting is called "Mc Laughlin 2.0" and has only seven twelfths of the content in common with the American version.  (Lisa Simpson is telling me to knock it off; they're never going to get the reference)  Clearly the Internet is a good thing and we all have a good thing going with a free Internet.  And the thing is the right wing groups I don't like would most likely suffer from such overt UN control- as our side would.  But on principle it's a really awful idea.  And yet the idea is being seriously considered because of the doctrine that internet activity "ought to reflect the interests of the controling government" or whatever.

Then there is the whole global warming thing and mass hysteria on the Mc Laughlin front, with Pat Buchannon about to have a cow at the idea that scientists would ever have any say in environmental laws that business has to abide by.  I've been hearing this "1998" red hearing we've been hearing lately. I will vouch for the fact that the summer of 1998 was one of the hottest in memory.  I'll go further and say that each successive year- - 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002 each of these successive summers was cooler than the previous one, as least as I experianced it.  But clearly even Mort Zuckerman states that C02 does impact the climate of the earth and impacts, indeed the productivity of things like agriculture and tourism themselves.  So that businesses have it in their Own Interest to be aware of Global Warming.  And the very idea that Several Hundred Scientists from all over the World would conspire to form some leftist "socialist government" no doubt all disciples of Bill Ayres and Sol Allinsky - - the very idea of that is so completely absurd I'm surprised Pat and that brunette lady weren't laughed off the state.  This British guy is a smart cookie, and he's more of a cool cucumber head than is Eleanor Clift, and should be on the program more often.  Cap and Trade is basically a sound idea as I see it.  Since the economy is in recovery now, I see no reason for not implementing it immediately.

We then come to Julio Castro, the Mayor of San Antonio and has a twin brother in congress.  To be honest I didn't know Which party convention had featured these Castro Twins.  Now we know it was the democrats.  People listening to him may get a preminition of "Obama II".  And frankly I fear that the same end may befall this promising young politician if he follows in the footsteps of his "handlers" or whoever was 'handling" Barock Obama's campaign as far back as 2004.  In this day and age- - just putting just "anybody" like a throw away "B Side' of an old '45 ("What a Shame") is something we don't want to befall this guy.  I too agree with the entire panel that his magnitude of "gravitas' or whatever will be insufficient to "turn Texas blue" by the year 2016.  But Cosmically it's even more alarming.  San Antonio as a city- - is heavily influenced by the "Del Rio Group" as you may have read from our writings.  I'm not feeling the "Del Rio" vibe from this guy at all.  I don't know what kind of a guy he will "mature into".  Sometimes people grow "into" bad behavior rather than "out" of it.   (Selah)  Of course I get these mailing links from Judy saying that the Democrats are pretty fed up with President Obama now, and the expression of the day is that he's "Out of Touch".  I honestly sat and wondered about that today.  I'm thinking "Was President Bush that much worse- - when he was President?"

Electric Circuits and Computer Program flow charts have certain essential things in common.  Both have a source and an end or termanus.  With both it is important never to cross your lines- - nor to attempt to run in self perpetuating Circles.  With programming- it's a very theocentric thing.  The Programmer is as - - an all Wise and Knowing God- - at least as far as the computer is concerned.  And the end result is hopefully "Where you want to go, the realization of all your dreams".

I don't think I said this but as you know Shawn Hannity has this call screener named Linda.  And she came out and admitted that her motto is "I believe that people are basically No Good - - until they Prove to me otherwise".  But this invites the logical question that "If you believe they are no good to begin with, how inclined are you to even give them a Chance to "Prove to you that they are something Other than No Good?"  This is of course complicated by the fact that- - few liberals get on Hannity's show.  I dare say that more liberals are let through on the Rush Limbaugh show than on Hannity's.

The Rev Chuck Smith was fond of saying that if you are "unsaved" meaning not a Calvary Christian, that you were basically as an Animal in that you had neither consciouness or awareness, or any contience, or moral values.  Even apes will however work together to accomplish a common goal, and even apes will be kind and thoughtful to each other given the right circumstances.  If there is ANYONE who lacks either AWARENESS or MORAL VALUES, it is the Calvary Christian.  And Neil Savedra can quote me on that.  I would like to talk about the "Dianna Troy" phenominon.   That is - - can people in truth "Know' but don't know that they know, or to use the progressive "Know that they are knowing"?  Do prove this we would have to strip away all linkage between Cause and Effect.  If for instance one is deprived of the use of his fleshly body, which happens at Death- - what consciousness remains?  Is his perception of the passage of Time any different?  Some may argue that "It violates physics to maintain that there is ("as you put it") something entity on one side of the teter totter and one entity on the other to balance it out, because they argue that negatives of anything- - exposed to positives of anything- - will nulify each other and you end up with Nothing, almost as if Neither Existed.  Clearly that doesn't happen because we're here and breathing.  That's why we said in the last posting there is such a thing as "Aether Zero".   People say it's zero outside, knowing it really isn't "Zero" that is, in absolute terms.  But it's a functional Zero in terms of the implementation of all the laws of Einstein in special and general relativity.  So indeed there is a "function" of negativity even with positive matter- - which - - happens to be lighter than Aether.  We have likened it to something like - - - I was going to liken it to havving sex when you've had too much marijuana, but nobody would know what I was talking about.  Let's call it an "inability to Arrive".  It's not exactly a walk to the next block to traverse the Aether Wall.  As we said a year and a half ago (in that posting of early October) one can argue that it's virtually Impossible.  Or put another say "However it's done, it isn't done in a manner that man is or will be able to discover or duplicate "How it's done".   People who are no longer AWARE - - like our tea party brain dead companions- - seem, though, to live in an Effect Only world.  It's like the time when Dianna Troy lost her psychic powers, and it drove her nuts.  But what would drive a normal person nuts is the world the Tea Party people and Calvary Christians live in all the time.  (Selah)

HILLARY MAKES HER STAND

According to Politico, Clinton uses the 34-page chapter on Benghazi to rebut criticisms and rebuke critics.   "Those who exploit this tragedy over and over as a political tool minimize the sacrifice of those who served our country," Clinton reportedly wrote.   She also seemed to make reference to the election-year select committee being led by congressional Republicans, saying: "I will not be a part of a political slugfest on the backs of dead Americans. It's just plain wrong, and it's unworthy of our great country. Those who insist on politicizing the tragedy will have to do so without me."   In the chapter, the former secretary decried the "speculation and flat-out deceit" surrounding the attack, while apparently taking responsibility and describing her grief over the four deaths as a "punch in the gut."   Despite her claims, Republicans say it was the White House and others in the administration who were deceiving lawmakers and the public about the nature of the attack. New concerns about the administration's public narrative in the days immediately following Sept. 11, 2012, are what led the House to form a select committee to investigate. The controversy resurfaced following the release of emails in which a White House adviser discussed a "prep call" for then-U.N. ambassador Susan Rice, stressing the role of an anti-Islam video. Rice came under fire for repeatedly saying the Sunday after the attack, incorrectly, that protests over an anti-Islam film were to blame.   Clinton, in her book, reportedly defended Rice, saying she got her talking points from existing intelligence. Further, Clinton argued it is still "inaccurate" to say none of the attackers were influenced by the video.   Clinton insisted as well that she never saw cables requesting more security at the Benghazi compound.  Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., who has clashed with Clinton over Benghazi in the past, told Fox News in response to the book excerpts: "Sounds like a carefully crafted framework for a defense that answers nothing."   Politico also reported Friday that former National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor was being brought on by Clinton's team to help with the response to the book. Vietor stirred controversy earlier this month after he brushed off a question about talking points editing during an interview on Fox News. "Dude, this was like two years ago," Vietor said.   At the meeting of Clinton aides in Washington on Friday, at the headquarters of the centrist think tank "Third Way," one Democratic operative who attended told Fox News that it was called "to discuss the Democratic message on national security." Despite reports that the meeting was called in part to hammer out a clear response to Republicans on Benghazi, the operative said the select committee on Benghazi "did not come up."   Another Democratic source said: "It was just a bunch of us nerds. We have these meeting all the time."


Fox News' Jake Gibson and James Rosen contributed to this report.

It's the Forensics, Stupid!

But before we get to that I'd like to touch on a couple of pressing news items.  On the Chris Matthews show today there was pointed out that the FACT of mismanagement in the Vetterans Administration has NOT been addressed, this as of Thursday night's episode, by either President Obama or Eric Gensecki.  Matthews points out that the President is making a major error in seeing this whole thing as "just political" and somehow there must be a "political solution" as opposed to an ACTUAL solution, that is digging down and addressing the root of the scandal to begin with.  Perhaps the Administration may have even fallen into this trap on the Bengazi issue.  Let's hope not.  Matthews wants to know why Hillary Clinton herself wasn't sent out on the Sunday morning TV talk circuit to address the issuee herself rather than put someone out there who ended up losing her job anyhow.  There is a Real Problem about vetterans not even being able to see a doctor for an Initial Visit, for four months.  Because the disease or malody they are suffering from isn't "going to put itself on hold" for four months but will most likely get worse.  I have gleaned - just my own impression that neither General Gensecki nor President Obama wanted to get to the root systemic Causes of the problem, but somehow felt as though "If only they could do something to shut the critics up" then all would be well and (at least as far as Obama is concerned) the problem would be Solved.

Now we move on to forensics.  Indeed with the George Zimmerman case it was forensics.  We know that blood does not travel up hill.  We know that voice patterns on a tape, only point to one speaker, and any technician could end all speculation as to just who was screaming- - if a technician was only allowed to testify.  We have that Dateline show last night, where the jurors in this murder case about a man killing his wife- - it would seem to be a case of "believing insane story A - - or insane story B".  So either a woman swan dived on to a granite rock, and did not break a single bone or have any other visable injuries from the fall- - or else this man, Fred- - suddenly snapped and decided to kill his wife with no reason.  So which do we believe.  As a juror to me this wouldn't be terribly difficult.  We know that for example the husband is "Has a natural tallent for selling or convincing you of anything".  And we know he was looking for a "newer model" as far as women are concerned.  We know that witness after witness testified "his emotions on learning of his wife's death - - seemed a little off".   We move on to other forensics such as the "magic bullet theory" as to whether Oswald acted alone in killing Jack Kennedy.  It's a logical possability that Oswald may indeed be guilty of shooting the president from the school book depository- - but that shots from Another Source, with a whole other motive- - that's the bullet that Killed the President.  We could talk about Christianity and the shroud of Turin.  We are told that Carbon 14 tests invalidate the shroud as being around at the time of Christ.  We further learn from bloodstain spatter that the blood is of such a patter that it was made by a Person Still Living, and not dead.  You don't hear this.  We are told insistently that Christianity is "a historic fact".  So there ought to be witnesses.  How many "witnesses" did Justin the theologian call upon to bolster his belief in Christianity?  Like maybe the guy who actually wrapped Jesus in those burial clothes and annointed him with spices and laid him in his own family tomb.  And why is it that Irenius, who wrote after Justin - it is he, for the first time, who cites this "apostolic chain back to Christ" - - and this guy Polycarp, who was burned at the stake at age 86 apparently.   Did the earlier Justin mention him?  We are regailed with other "historic facts" that the apostle John was first boiled in oil, except "He wouldn't boil' and they took him out and banished him to the Isle of Patnos where he wrote Revelation.  Then he went to Empisus- - where he sat around saying "children, love one another".   We are also informed that ALL of the epistles of St Paul were "found in a group" in Ephesus.  Yet Justin never cites Paul by name so far as I know.  We could ask ourselves other questions like- - did the owner of the tomb who wrapped Jesus' body in spices- - - what was HIS reaction to the news that Jesus was still alive?  Did he go down to the grave site himself and see if the body was still in the tomb and maybe whoever the women saw- - was some Impostor?  No.  We never hear from Joseph of Arethmea again after the final Gospel.  It would seem that the man who physically burried Jesus- - had no concern at all about- - whether the man he laid in the grave Stayed Burried or not.  We are told further by Theologians that "knowledge" is bad.  That is "experiential knowledge" or "investigative knowledge' or "an acquaintance with" - is bad.  We are informed that real Truth is 'revealed" not gone after and hunted down and scientifically investigated.

I was thinking of including an excerpt from the chapter on Hillary Clinton's upcoming book on all of the Bengazi issues.  I urge readers to secure a copy of this text and read it through, as soon as you can.  Hillary announced a principle here we need to think about.  She said "Is this a case of Unanswered Questions - - or rather is it a case of "Un listened to Answers?"  You can apply it to the previous paragraph, or the previous posting if you want to.  Where are all of the "Answers" that we have supposedly been given on all of these issues that somehow I have not "been listening to"?  I would honestly like to be informed if you can tell me.  I'm glad to see that Hillary is willing to come out fighting.  I regard the desire to Justify one's own actions as not a "carnal" attribute, but rather as inherent and good and proper as part of ones innate nature.  Interestingly "the survival instinct" is what Ron Hubbard and his cohorts - call the greatest Virtue of all.  (Selah)  As I said one of the things that prompted me to vote for George Bush over John Kerry in 2004 was that after the Swift Boat campaign attacks, John Kerry had little if any response to it.  It would seem to me he was content to let the many charges levied go unresponded to.  Hillary Clinton is not making the same mistake, but instead wisely has decided to come out swinging.

I would now like to address that long and arguably confusing paragraph at the end of the March 4th blog posting.  One might say "He's rambling and doesn't know what the hell he's talking about".  Let me go to give this example though.  Just like with that first jury last night in the Colorado murder case- - it doesn't matter whether jury members are- - half convinced the guy is guilty or even three fourths convinced the guy is guilty.  Because under the rules you have to be one hundred percent convinced the guy is guilty.  It's like champansees in a room with a big bunch of bananas on a high platform or ledge.  They are unable to leap high enough to reach the bananas.  But if there are blocks in the room they can construct steps or a stool or something to climb up in increments to get those bananas.  So it is with you people's understanding of that long paragraph.  So let me explain things again in a different manner you haven't heard before.  Rather than think of the hour glass- - or terms like UP or DOWN perhaps it's wiser to speak in terms of "close to the wall" or "farther away from the wall".  Now "The wall"  it could be an engram wall or a bozon wall - - but the WALL represents Death.  But it also represents Certainty.  It also represents Time (almost as a thing) and it represents Gravity.  Yes, there is a positive coralation between the presence of Gravity and Time.  And we spoke of "Gravitas" in that paragraph.  So what is "Gravitas".  It's basically what you might call throw weight.  Under Newtonian physics- - Throw Weight or Impact Weight- - is influenced by both Mass and Speed.  If you increase either the Speed or Mass you increase the weight impact.  The other variable can also influence Impact weight.  This would be- - the measuring unit you use to measure the plane - - two dimensional plane- where the impact is to take place.  If you shrink the measuring unit- - you increase the weight or if you will - gravitas.  And perhaps the Bowling example will fit better here.  Because as I learned in a computer Bowling game- - accurecy isn't everything.  Speed counts.  If you don't have the speed of the throw of the ball, your "gravitas" goes down.  So now we speak of "karmic speed".   We said that Death was Predictability - - and so Life is unpredictability - or if you will "Free Will".  The farther you are away from "The Wall" the more free will you have.  Also in the Bible there is spoken of that "Life is in an eternal opposition to Death".   At this time we remind you when we speak in terms of 'zero mass" as physicists measure it - - is "aether zero".   (A minor but inportant distinction)  We also spoke of the "Low Pressure area" as if it were "rising air" or the "upward drive" of the human spirit.  But there is also this "movement tword the Wall", which might be called the "force of certainty" or some might call "Sin".  I'd remind you we said "sin is the price we pay for existance"  So some might (reasonably) infer that I am elevated the state of Sin Itself to a status it has never enjoyed before.  (Selah)  Let's look at this further.  Let me ask you - is there "error" in pure Fact, as in "Factual occurance"?  Some would say that "sin is a flaw in God-planned perfection".  Really?  You may cry "oh but for Sin, the world would be so wonderful!" But let me ask you "If you are God and you express your Will for the Future- - and the Future diverts from your goal for it- - who is the one who Sinned?  Did "The World' Sin because it deviated from your Divine Plans- - or is it in fact that your Divine Plans "Sinned" because they missed "The Mark" which when you come to it is "Whatever actually ends up happening".   So there is this pull of "The Wall" that seems to pull and drive people.  We then spoke of the "upper world' of Cause and the "lower world' of Effect.  Could it be that in an ironic way we are protected from the worst machinations of Evil people because of their own Sin, which prevents them from carrying out their very worse desires?  (Selah)  Here's another paradox.  For the psyche to exist in the world, it can only do this if to some extent it conforms to the "conventions" of the World.  The more something in fact "exists" as a physicist would measure it- -the more it has to (as St Paul dreads saying) conform to the elemental laws of the Universe.  There is your dreaded "downward pull" or "being pulled tword the Wall.  But I told you that you needn't think of UP or DOWN because it's all relative anyhow.  In order to be a THING that EXISTS it's more "material" to exist - - - IN as much TIME as you can.  Consider what I have said about the certainty of The Wall and the Uncertainty away from it- -as my own version of "The Heizenberg Uncertainty Principle".   The more Time you have the more Certainty there is in the world.  The more positive you can be about one event Following another or say "This event' came Before "That".  And it's pretty much "easier to play the game" the more certainty you have about the Rules, then you aren't at all of what the rules are or what will happen when you take this or that action.   Just remember that- - these all run in bunches.  You have Existance, and Order, sequence- - Time - - Gravity - - all on one side of the ledger, and their opposites on the other side.  Now having absorbed the knowledge of this paragraph, so tack now and try to tackle the other paragraph from three months ago.

Friday, May 30, 2014

The Dog That Didn't Bark

Most of this posting is about 9 -11.  It seems if a crime is horrific and blatant enough, those who plerpetrated it seem to be immune from any day of reckoning, and seem to sleep very well at night.

Gabriel Hernandez apparently finds cold blood murder therapeutic.  It’s amazing how peaceful and unruffled she’s been throughout this whole thing.  Until just now nobody ever questioned her about the murder – and she wasn’t the least bit concerned.   I find the whole thing really stretching my ability to believe.  They left out the key scene where Jennifer told Eric what she had learned from overhearing a conversation between Daniel and Nicole.  I thought she would burst in with a fury of anger.  But instead she smartly goes to where Eric is in the park or wherever, and informs him of Nicole’s treachery.   Now the jig is up.  Nocole is officially “done”.  Stick a fork in her.  It is my abiding Prayer that the Christian Church would meet a similar ignominius fate.

Thom Hartman claims that George Bush never even went back to Washington DC after his “longest presidential vacation since George Washington” in August and September of 2001.  Then he sequestered himself with brother Jeb Bush in Florida.  I’d like to know what timetable Hartman is working off of.  Sometimes though it just seems that if your crime is bad and blatant enough- - the Day of Reckoning never arrives.  It seemed to not bother Hartman that it could be multiple decades before we ever learn the real truth about what happened in and around 9 – 11 – 2001.  I was looking up President Bush’s movements at the time of 9 – 11.  Since he was in the limozine when he got the news of the first Twin Tower attack, he could have been watching it on sattalite TV hook-up or something that nobody else sees.  It’s a case of “The dog that didn’t bark” because the secret service agents were not concerned at all about the President’s safety in terms of going to the elementary school, or whether he himself was in personal danger.  And the interruption from Andrew Card while reading to the school children “had the nature more of a progress report rather than anything new and alarming”.   They say the President read to the children for another fifteen minutes.  And then they took off to Shriveport, and he didn’t make it back to the Capital till just before seven that evening.  The whole thing smells.  Laura of course remained in Washington D. C. 

The ammount of evidence indicating funny business surrounding the events of 9 - 11 is overwhelming.  Here's one you may have forgotten about.  ABC news actually once upon a time used to do investigative stories like you'd never see today.  There was a raft of "put" stock options against certain key Airlines the Thursday before the 9 - 11 attacks.  The other heavy "put" action involved companies that were headquartered in the World Trade Center buildings.  I "put" is basically a "short" for cowards, where you make a lot of money is the price of a stock collapses suddenly.  I think they were saying that certain "put" options were made ninety TIMES the rate that ONE DAY that they would be made in a normal three week period.  The ammount of profit to be made and presumably WAS made was ginormous!   Profit from massive tragedy!

There were so many witness speaking of and reporting explosions in the Twin Towers, it isn't funny, and apparently this even includes George Stephanopolus.  Strangely, a lot of these witnesses ended up dead.  We went into detail a week or so back about explosive devices being strapped on the bottom of at least one plane and how BOTH planes have visual proof- - of a flash- - just an instant prior to impact.  They've gone over the photos with high tech analysis.

Dick Chaney demanded to take over NORAD in June of 2001.  Prior to then the generals had always called the shot but Dick Chaney insisted on personal control.  He issued a "stand down" order on 9 - 11.  Secretary Rice for one flat out lied when she said "There was absolutely expectation of any plains hitting buildings.  Not only had she been warned expressly about this several weeks prior, but also there were in fact Drills involving planes crashing into buildings carried out by the CIA,

Clearly the plot to the "Flight 93" thing was pure fiction.  For one thing cell phones aren't allowed on flights.  But further- - they say a cell phone wouldn't work at the altitude and speed this craft was flying.  Also there is a man eye witness who talked about "The lights dimming' just before the ariel explosion.  He was later told this is what a fighter craft does.  It emits a signal to jam the radar of the object plane- - just before taking it out.  There was also that woman who was told in essence by FBI agents "what she saw" when it WASN'T what she saw.  She swears the plane she saw was too small to be a 757 and also people report seeing a second plane matching speed to the first.  There are reports of witnesses of the second plane "flying off into the sun" so it could not be identified.  Also on the supposed "tape" - - cockpit tapes don't cover conversation in the rest of the plane, yet this recording picked up passenger chatter.  Also the final words spoken by the hijackers was not that of the standard Islamic prayer, which is 'There is only one God, and Mohamed is his prophet".  This is the prayer ever devout Muslem is supposed to recite when he is facing imminent death.

There is finally the fact that these hijackers couldn't possibly fly these big complex planes with the paultry ammount of flying training they had, where they weren't very good.  There is also this one guy who repeated to the FBI in advance that "They were being taught to crash into buildings" and was ignored every time.  Of course the FBI produced this list of nineteen hijackers with extrordenary speed.  But guess what?  Several of the hijackers turned up later very much Alive.  AND the FBI did NOT modify their list after they found this out.  Also there were no autopseys done on ANY of the dead hijackers.  Why?  Also none of these nineteen names showed up on the passenger list.  This is a pretty tough trick to pull off.  Also there are alligations one of the Bin Laden videos was faked because the man was right handed and Bin Laden is left handed, or visa versa.  Other than hearing the voice of God booming down from Mt Sinai itself- - I hardly see how you could have any more convincing proof.

Unfortunately the whole presentation ends on a bit of an off note, because they resurrect the plot line from the book "The Fourth Turning' with its eight year cycles.  They take to attacking the Federal Reserve and speak of replacing the dollar with an international currency.  They then go out on a limb and say there will be some Naval incident or something in the straits of Hormuz in the Pursian Gulf where the US conducts a "false flag" opperation in order to start a war with Iran and China, because it would seem "The non white nations are taking over and we are very much afraid of that".  My cosmic sources tell me that the odds of any war with Iran at this point is infinitessably low.  But all the same I think there is going to be some "faked up crisis' in a few months- - just not this.  It still pays for all of us to have our psychic antenna up for anything and keep our eyes pealed for trouble.