It's the Forensics, Stupid!

But before we get to that I'd like to touch on a couple of pressing news items.  On the Chris Matthews show today there was pointed out that the FACT of mismanagement in the Vetterans Administration has NOT been addressed, this as of Thursday night's episode, by either President Obama or Eric Gensecki.  Matthews points out that the President is making a major error in seeing this whole thing as "just political" and somehow there must be a "political solution" as opposed to an ACTUAL solution, that is digging down and addressing the root of the scandal to begin with.  Perhaps the Administration may have even fallen into this trap on the Bengazi issue.  Let's hope not.  Matthews wants to know why Hillary Clinton herself wasn't sent out on the Sunday morning TV talk circuit to address the issuee herself rather than put someone out there who ended up losing her job anyhow.  There is a Real Problem about vetterans not even being able to see a doctor for an Initial Visit, for four months.  Because the disease or malody they are suffering from isn't "going to put itself on hold" for four months but will most likely get worse.  I have gleaned - just my own impression that neither General Gensecki nor President Obama wanted to get to the root systemic Causes of the problem, but somehow felt as though "If only they could do something to shut the critics up" then all would be well and (at least as far as Obama is concerned) the problem would be Solved.

Now we move on to forensics.  Indeed with the George Zimmerman case it was forensics.  We know that blood does not travel up hill.  We know that voice patterns on a tape, only point to one speaker, and any technician could end all speculation as to just who was screaming- - if a technician was only allowed to testify.  We have that Dateline show last night, where the jurors in this murder case about a man killing his wife- - it would seem to be a case of "believing insane story A - - or insane story B".  So either a woman swan dived on to a granite rock, and did not break a single bone or have any other visable injuries from the fall- - or else this man, Fred- - suddenly snapped and decided to kill his wife with no reason.  So which do we believe.  As a juror to me this wouldn't be terribly difficult.  We know that for example the husband is "Has a natural tallent for selling or convincing you of anything".  And we know he was looking for a "newer model" as far as women are concerned.  We know that witness after witness testified "his emotions on learning of his wife's death - - seemed a little off".   We move on to other forensics such as the "magic bullet theory" as to whether Oswald acted alone in killing Jack Kennedy.  It's a logical possability that Oswald may indeed be guilty of shooting the president from the school book depository- - but that shots from Another Source, with a whole other motive- - that's the bullet that Killed the President.  We could talk about Christianity and the shroud of Turin.  We are told that Carbon 14 tests invalidate the shroud as being around at the time of Christ.  We further learn from bloodstain spatter that the blood is of such a patter that it was made by a Person Still Living, and not dead.  You don't hear this.  We are told insistently that Christianity is "a historic fact".  So there ought to be witnesses.  How many "witnesses" did Justin the theologian call upon to bolster his belief in Christianity?  Like maybe the guy who actually wrapped Jesus in those burial clothes and annointed him with spices and laid him in his own family tomb.  And why is it that Irenius, who wrote after Justin - it is he, for the first time, who cites this "apostolic chain back to Christ" - - and this guy Polycarp, who was burned at the stake at age 86 apparently.   Did the earlier Justin mention him?  We are regailed with other "historic facts" that the apostle John was first boiled in oil, except "He wouldn't boil' and they took him out and banished him to the Isle of Patnos where he wrote Revelation.  Then he went to Empisus- - where he sat around saying "children, love one another".   We are also informed that ALL of the epistles of St Paul were "found in a group" in Ephesus.  Yet Justin never cites Paul by name so far as I know.  We could ask ourselves other questions like- - did the owner of the tomb who wrapped Jesus' body in spices- - - what was HIS reaction to the news that Jesus was still alive?  Did he go down to the grave site himself and see if the body was still in the tomb and maybe whoever the women saw- - was some Impostor?  No.  We never hear from Joseph of Arethmea again after the final Gospel.  It would seem that the man who physically burried Jesus- - had no concern at all about- - whether the man he laid in the grave Stayed Burried or not.  We are told further by Theologians that "knowledge" is bad.  That is "experiential knowledge" or "investigative knowledge' or "an acquaintance with" - is bad.  We are informed that real Truth is 'revealed" not gone after and hunted down and scientifically investigated.

I was thinking of including an excerpt from the chapter on Hillary Clinton's upcoming book on all of the Bengazi issues.  I urge readers to secure a copy of this text and read it through, as soon as you can.  Hillary announced a principle here we need to think about.  She said "Is this a case of Unanswered Questions - - or rather is it a case of "Un listened to Answers?"  You can apply it to the previous paragraph, or the previous posting if you want to.  Where are all of the "Answers" that we have supposedly been given on all of these issues that somehow I have not "been listening to"?  I would honestly like to be informed if you can tell me.  I'm glad to see that Hillary is willing to come out fighting.  I regard the desire to Justify one's own actions as not a "carnal" attribute, but rather as inherent and good and proper as part of ones innate nature.  Interestingly "the survival instinct" is what Ron Hubbard and his cohorts - call the greatest Virtue of all.  (Selah)  As I said one of the things that prompted me to vote for George Bush over John Kerry in 2004 was that after the Swift Boat campaign attacks, John Kerry had little if any response to it.  It would seem to me he was content to let the many charges levied go unresponded to.  Hillary Clinton is not making the same mistake, but instead wisely has decided to come out swinging.

I would now like to address that long and arguably confusing paragraph at the end of the March 4th blog posting.  One might say "He's rambling and doesn't know what the hell he's talking about".  Let me go to give this example though.  Just like with that first jury last night in the Colorado murder case- - it doesn't matter whether jury members are- - half convinced the guy is guilty or even three fourths convinced the guy is guilty.  Because under the rules you have to be one hundred percent convinced the guy is guilty.  It's like champansees in a room with a big bunch of bananas on a high platform or ledge.  They are unable to leap high enough to reach the bananas.  But if there are blocks in the room they can construct steps or a stool or something to climb up in increments to get those bananas.  So it is with you people's understanding of that long paragraph.  So let me explain things again in a different manner you haven't heard before.  Rather than think of the hour glass- - or terms like UP or DOWN perhaps it's wiser to speak in terms of "close to the wall" or "farther away from the wall".  Now "The wall"  it could be an engram wall or a bozon wall - - but the WALL represents Death.  But it also represents Certainty.  It also represents Time (almost as a thing) and it represents Gravity.  Yes, there is a positive coralation between the presence of Gravity and Time.  And we spoke of "Gravitas" in that paragraph.  So what is "Gravitas".  It's basically what you might call throw weight.  Under Newtonian physics- - Throw Weight or Impact Weight- - is influenced by both Mass and Speed.  If you increase either the Speed or Mass you increase the weight impact.  The other variable can also influence Impact weight.  This would be- - the measuring unit you use to measure the plane - - two dimensional plane- where the impact is to take place.  If you shrink the measuring unit- - you increase the weight or if you will - gravitas.  And perhaps the Bowling example will fit better here.  Because as I learned in a computer Bowling game- - accurecy isn't everything.  Speed counts.  If you don't have the speed of the throw of the ball, your "gravitas" goes down.  So now we speak of "karmic speed".   We said that Death was Predictability - - and so Life is unpredictability - or if you will "Free Will".  The farther you are away from "The Wall" the more free will you have.  Also in the Bible there is spoken of that "Life is in an eternal opposition to Death".   At this time we remind you when we speak in terms of 'zero mass" as physicists measure it - - is "aether zero".   (A minor but inportant distinction)  We also spoke of the "Low Pressure area" as if it were "rising air" or the "upward drive" of the human spirit.  But there is also this "movement tword the Wall", which might be called the "force of certainty" or some might call "Sin".  I'd remind you we said "sin is the price we pay for existance"  So some might (reasonably) infer that I am elevated the state of Sin Itself to a status it has never enjoyed before.  (Selah)  Let's look at this further.  Let me ask you - is there "error" in pure Fact, as in "Factual occurance"?  Some would say that "sin is a flaw in God-planned perfection".  Really?  You may cry "oh but for Sin, the world would be so wonderful!" But let me ask you "If you are God and you express your Will for the Future- - and the Future diverts from your goal for it- - who is the one who Sinned?  Did "The World' Sin because it deviated from your Divine Plans- - or is it in fact that your Divine Plans "Sinned" because they missed "The Mark" which when you come to it is "Whatever actually ends up happening".   So there is this pull of "The Wall" that seems to pull and drive people.  We then spoke of the "upper world' of Cause and the "lower world' of Effect.  Could it be that in an ironic way we are protected from the worst machinations of Evil people because of their own Sin, which prevents them from carrying out their very worse desires?  (Selah)  Here's another paradox.  For the psyche to exist in the world, it can only do this if to some extent it conforms to the "conventions" of the World.  The more something in fact "exists" as a physicist would measure it- -the more it has to (as St Paul dreads saying) conform to the elemental laws of the Universe.  There is your dreaded "downward pull" or "being pulled tword the Wall.  But I told you that you needn't think of UP or DOWN because it's all relative anyhow.  In order to be a THING that EXISTS it's more "material" to exist - - - IN as much TIME as you can.  Consider what I have said about the certainty of The Wall and the Uncertainty away from it- -as my own version of "The Heizenberg Uncertainty Principle".   The more Time you have the more Certainty there is in the world.  The more positive you can be about one event Following another or say "This event' came Before "That".  And it's pretty much "easier to play the game" the more certainty you have about the Rules, then you aren't at all of what the rules are or what will happen when you take this or that action.   Just remember that- - these all run in bunches.  You have Existance, and Order, sequence- - Time - - Gravity - - all on one side of the ledger, and their opposites on the other side.  Now having absorbed the knowledge of this paragraph, so tack now and try to tackle the other paragraph from three months ago.