Norman Goldman is an Asshole

I was forced to ask myself whether I would vote for Trump if the only real alternative turns out to be Hillary; and, I concluded that, yes, I would, and that the reason is precisely because I don’t trust either candidate, but that only in the case of Hillary am I certain that she as President would be catastrophic. At least with Trump, I have no way of knowing what his real policies would be. from Washington's Blog.

Last night Bernie Sanders won India 53% to 47% for Hillary.  I just now learned even that much after being told by the media it was a “decisive victory”.   Bill Press this morning was tooting Sanders’ horn.  It’s high time we got a little unabashed praise for Sanders without bashing him in the next sentence the way Stephanie Miller and Norman Goldman do.   Bernie Sanders says “If Hillary thinks this campaign is over I’ve got some bad news for her”.  He also said “How many in the crowd are afraid Donald Trump will be President?  I’m here to tell you that won’t happen”.  There is this Rasputen poll that Rush loves - - that says Trump is leading Hillary by a few points.  This is a small but definite danger signal for Hillary.  A 22 year old young adult never heard of Jim Morrison and the Doors but says “Hillary is the devil”.  Maybe this kid is smarter than we think he is.  There’s this Jim Morrison cave covered in graffiti- - that they closed to the public.  I say “What the hell- - leave the graffiti”.  They claimed at one time the entire cave was spray painted pink.  I would have liked to have seen that.   Don’t you hate parents that live out their atonement for the guilt of something in their youth by taking it out on their kids?   Well since Ted Kennedy made an impassioned speech at the Democratic convention in 1980 and Carter lost, therefore Hillary will lose if Bernie Sanders gives an impassioned speech at this year’s democratic convention.  Why don’t they just put out a giant sign on the front of the radio station saying “This is your official Hillary Clinton for President Headquarters”?   Goldman professes to get all of these callers saying “I was for Bernie but if my choice now is between Hillary and Donald Trump then I’m voting for Trump”.   Some callers would have you believe that there are vast numbers of disappointed Bernie fans out there.  It does no good to say that “Karl Rove put them up to it”.  That makes no sense.  Bernie polls much stronger against Trump than does Hillary now.  The Republicans have always set their sights on Hillary and not Bernie as the person they want to run against.  Logic would dictate that is Bernie were the whacked out unelectable Socialist they say he is- - then Rush and Shawn would not wait to run against Bernie.  But that isn’t happening.  This whole Karl Rove rationalization is clearly wearing thin.  There is a saying that if three different people call you an ass in one day- - then it’s time to put on a bridal.  May I suggest people like Norman Goldman are that ass.  They see something happening with the electorate and they can’t face it.  That “something” is that Hillary is not a good campaigner and turns a whole lot of people off to her.  Shawn Hannity has pointed it out.  Hillary isn’t being “molded into the liberal we all wish we were”.  This line of wishful thinking by Hartman and Stephanie is also wearing thin.  Hillary isn’t changing.  Whatever baggage she’s been carrying around for the last 25 years, she’s still carrying!  

I've been meaning to say more on special relativity and today is the perfect time. My view of “The event horizon” has gone hot and cold alternately.  In the fall of 2009 I “brought back the event horizon” to state that faster than light travel was clearly possible under Newtonian laws.  I further said that all of the light and time distortions witnessed under special relativity were explainable using Newtonian logic.  On the surface it may be.  We know about the red shift for objects going away from you and the blue shift for approaching objects.  This phenominum is not under dispute.  It has been observed for over a century.  Also not in dispute is that red light bends less than blue light.  This does not mean you see visually more red or blue tinted images but there is red Shift or blue Shift meaning the SOURCE of what you are seeing comes from a different wave length than you think.  However there is another law that kicks in where "fast light" (for lack of a better term receding light) bends MORE and not less and forms in front of the retina making you near sighted.  In other words it focuses too soon and "slow light" (approaching light) forms an image behind the retina making you far sighted, which is what actually happens. I go into great detail on this back in the fall of 2009.  I also explain how straight lines appear curved and how observable time would appear to speed up under a blue shift and slow down under a red shift.  But there is a part of the puzzle I chose to ignore back in 2009.  Does the math or the degree or proportion at which these things take place conform to Newtonian laws?  The answer is no they don’t.  Back in 2008 I was smart enough to say that Black Holes can’t exist under the laws of special relativity.  I wish I’d held tight to that belief because the addition of velocities formula so central to the theory- - does not allow for ANY figure of greater than the value ONE.  (If you try it crazy things happen)  What this means in everyday terms is that there IS - - as in CAN’T BE any point in which an object just travels so fast it disappears from our sights.  A lot of my beliefs these past few years have been based on the idea that there is a vast “faster than light” world out there- - in the unseen Universe over the event horizon.  The addition of velocities formula won’t allow for it.  What I am NOT saying is that “The whole theory is based on an elaborate visual illusion”.  It may well be still an illusion.  It’s just a different KIND of illusion.  Ether behaves in strange ways that don’t conform to Newtonian physics.  I should have realized this.  Ether is its own entity and plays by its own rules.  I hope this clarifies my new stance for you.