Today the
President announced unilaterally that he was restoring diplomatic relations
with Cuba. I didn’t know one man had
that kind of power, but Sean Hannity acts as though it’s a done deal. The move seems particularly stupid because
Marco Rubio just announced for President with his sizable Cuban constituency. The big thaw was triggered by an exchange of
political prisoners between Cuba and the United States. Cuba got three prisoners we were holding and
we got 53 prisoners freed. Coincidentally,
Sean Hannity left out that little detail in his rant today. We did hear that Ted Cruise is NOT elligable
to run for President because unlike John Mc Cain, Cruise was not born in US
territory, and having your mother as a citizen doesn’t count. I continued to be puzzled why Hannity keeps
trotting out radicals such as Bill Ayres and Jeremiah Wright. But the president should not have opened the
door. Of course keep in mind that Obama
was eleven when Nixon was being renominated by the Republican party in one of
the best produced “Made for television” conventions of all time. Red China had been recognized by one and all,
and the SALT talks had been held with Breshnev.
And it was about August of 1972 that the Sixties could officially be
pronounced dead - - when all the polls showed Nixon winning by a
landslide. But I’m wondering about this
Cuban refugee guy that Sean Hannity talked to.
Let’s say that Sean was a fourteen year old teenager at the time - -
this would still be 1975 when “Communism” was no longer considered that big of
a threat. I have to wonder what spending your formative years in Alabama has to
do with it. Jeb Bush formed a campaign committee
to run for President and he has to fight Rubio for the same Latino
constituants. And they are both from
Florida. They’ll knock each other off
and Christie could come out the winner.
There are so many candidates, including perhaps Alan Keys, for
President- - even the biggest drawing candidate doesn’t exceed fifteen
percent. Now we have negotiations for “the
past year and a half” of diplomatic relations with Cuba. I don’t know what to think of it. It seems that Pope Francis welcomes the thaw
in relations with said Cuba. Hannity and
Rubio call themselves good Catholics, so their beef is not with me but with the
Pope. And Pope Francis is a popular, charismatic
Pope to try and go up against. Don’t you
think?
Ever since the torture report was released last week, U.S. television outlets have endlessly featured American torturers and torture proponents. But there was one group that was almost never heard from: the victims of their torture, not even the ones recognized by the U.S. Government itself as innocent, not even the family members of the ones they tortured to death. Whether by design (most likely) or effect, this inexcusable omission radically distorts coverage. Whenever America is forced to confront its heinous acts, the central strategy is to disappear the victims, render them invisible. That’s what robs them of their humanity: it’s the process of dehumanization. That, in turns, is what enables American elites first to support atrocities, and then, when forced to reckon with them, tell themselves that – despite some isolated and well-intentioned bad acts – they are still really good, elevated, noble, admirable people. It’s hardly surprising, then, that a Washington Post/ABC News poll released this morning found that a large majority of Americans believe torture is justified even when you call it “torture.” Not having to think about actual human victims makes it easy to justify any sort of crime.
Ever since the torture report was released last week, U.S. television outlets have endlessly featured American torturers and torture proponents. But there was one group that was almost never heard from: the victims of their torture, not even the ones recognized by the U.S. Government itself as innocent, not even the family members of the ones they tortured to death. Whether by design (most likely) or effect, this inexcusable omission radically distorts coverage. Whenever America is forced to confront its heinous acts, the central strategy is to disappear the victims, render them invisible. That’s what robs them of their humanity: it’s the process of dehumanization. That, in turns, is what enables American elites first to support atrocities, and then, when forced to reckon with them, tell themselves that – despite some isolated and well-intentioned bad acts – they are still really good, elevated, noble, admirable people. It’s hardly surprising, then, that a Washington Post/ABC News poll released this morning found that a large majority of Americans believe torture is justified even when you call it “torture.” Not having to think about actual human victims makes it easy to justify any sort of crime.
Will the
gulf between left and right ever be bridged?
Mike Papentonio said that these whole situations with grand juries
failing to indict Police Officers for anything- - is based largely on the fact
that they don’t question the officer’s testimony to them. They can say “I felt like a five year old in
the hands of the Hulk” or they can talk about a “demonic look in the eyes” or
the classic “He was going for his gun belt” or almost anything. What I want to know is “Where are those ten
or twelve Black people who supported Darren Wilson’s story. Why aren’t all of THEM all over FOX news now
giving their testimony. I have not heard
word One out of any of them, and severely doubt that any of them actually
exist. And yet from the other side of
the fence we hear that liberals are hyper sensitive and hyper offended by civil
rights and race issues. Now we hear that
Michelle Obama was “offended” because some woman in a Target store asked her to
get something off a high shelf for her, as though she were a floor worker. And the President is quoted as saying “I’ve
been mistaken for a bellhop”. There was
much talk about the “pace and rhythm of the President’s words” giving this
speech, which was needless to say was before he was elected President. Whatever President Obama used to be- - - if
he ever was a liberal to begin with- - - he most certainly chucked that all
aside the minute he made the decision to become a serious candidate for
President and do whatever he had to do to win.
But by opening up this Cuba sore point with the Right “all that stuff”
about Obama’s supposed radicalism comes right back to the forefront. And visions of “2016” come to the fore again
with talk about how “The President will never face another election and is free
to advance his radical, leftist agenda without fear”. All of this anti Obama talk could end up
hurting Hillary.
With the
three or four Trillion dollars the Federal Reserve has given the banks to
further bolster their profits in capital gains in stock investments- - the
government could have given each and every American - - ten thousand
dollars. Ten thousand dollars would be
about two thirds higher than a lot of individuals on fixed social security
incomes get each year. There is no doubt
at all that such a move would stimulate the economy. If the federal government had cracked down on
employers who hire illegal aliens, this would raise the wage base for all
Americans. But they won’t do that,
either. If they had passed a
democratically sponsored tax bill, they could have prevented jobs from being
shipped off to foreign countries starting last year. But John Boehner and the House refused to do
that. I don’t like to see powerless
people being taken advantage of. Perhaps
this is what separates liberals from conservatives. The latter doesn’t care. Conservatives don’t care if various type of
minorities- including the mentally ill- - get beaten up or killed by the cops,
if it doesn’t happen to them. Mike
Papentonio was talking today about various forms of wage theft on those already
down to minimum wage. They are now
saying that “setting up” in the morning and “cleaning up” at closing time- -
doesn’t count for the salary a fry cook makes, for example. Illegal aliens dare not protest their living
circumstances. Since Ronald Reagan and
George Bush 41 were the ones who “set up” the whole “dreamer” problem we have
now with children of illegal aliens- - I guess I see it as the government’s responsibility
to some how ‘make it right’ for these people.
This Rock Star guy on Monday’s “Law and Order” episode was a crusader
for the rights of the mentally ill and I admire him for that. He had a hellish life in a mental institution
including getting electro shock. And yet
one person had the audacity to say to him “Well you’re not insane now and you
were then - - so you OWE those people your sanity, do you not?” That line is right on a par with people
claiming that African slaves “got a free boat ride” to this country, and were
Christianized in the bargain. And then
others say that “Those slaves were Godly people”. It’s one thing to say you share the concerns
of the down and out- - disempowered. It’s
quite another thing to be ONE of them.
But the establishment is good at vilifying the disempowered and putting
THEM on trial. They did this in the
second century with the Jews after the Second Jewish war. They invented a whole religion who’s goal
seems to have been “Making Romans and other gentiles feel GOOD about pointing
the finger at these disempowered Jews.
There are no “checks and balances” of police power. Norman Goldman put it strangely but probably
correctly when he said “There are no Definite requirements in our legal
system. It’s all what some grand jury of
DA decrees at the moment, and it’s an amazingly subjective thing”. I find this Truth highly disturbing. And if the poor and down and out ever DO get
any firm “legal rights” you know people like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity are
the first ones to complain. Like that
song “Now’s the Time” says, these people
want “liberty and freedom” but they only want that so that they can take YOUR
rights away. They think abusing YOU is
one of their God-given “rights” that is now being threatened by “liberalism”. Someone said the age of the average FOX news
viewer was over sixty five. If this is
so one will hope their ranks will not be replemished as the older ones
die. There is some sinister force out
there literally “Feeding the hate” with some sort of “underground pipeline”. We as liberals need to find a way of somehow,
some way, shutting that whole thing down.
Soap opera
character Eric Brady now finds himself paralyzed by doubt- - and
resentment. But strangely people like
Neil of KFI (Jesus Christ show) rather
than try and help him are inwardly saying “Good. I hope he STAYS that way) To quote a favorite Dylan song “They say “How
are you, good luck, but they don’t mean it.
Because you know as well as me that you’d rather see me paralyzed”. It’s like a girl looking for a new romance
after the break up of an old one- - people like Dr Laura or Neil would say “Finding
a new romance is the WORST thing you could possibly do”. It’s kind of in the same vein as people
plagued by theological doubts. They say “The
WORST thing you could do is actually answer their questions, even if you have
them. By the way if you DO have them,
DON’T tell the person asking them, who wants to clear up his doubts that are
troubling him so, and frankly you should SAY you DO have them even if you don’t
because you must stress that that ethereal thing called PATIENCE takes TIME (I
would adlib here “A whole lot of precious time you ain’t got”. If you keep such a seeker of truth in a
NEEDY position, then YOU have the power.
YOU have the control over him.
(Selah) And when it comes to
resolving questions of God- - just as that Rock Star decided he didn’t need
pills to keep him Sane, others decide
the only way to keep from GOING INSANE is to abandon their self defeating
belief in God. But then Neil of KFI will
come along and say “This is just a sign that a person has mental (sanity)
issues, because no Sane person would ever come to the conclusion that God doesn’t
exist. So how different is Neil’s view
than the old Russian gulags or mental institutions they kept dissidents
in? But you know people like Neil of
KFI are completely nuts by their next statement. Some lady caller says “Well I need to pray
for a healing of this mentally ill guy I’d like to share Christ with”. You’d think Neil would be all FOR
that. But he isn’t. To summarize Neil Savedra’s view on mankind
there is a name for what people like him do with callers. It’s called Crazy Making. People like Neil Savedra are “toxic people”
who I’d advise a lot of people to just steer clear of, the way Brady Black
tells Melanie to steer clear of Teresa.
Because no good can come from having their paths cross. (Selah)